Directions: Read the following passage and select the correct answer.

Amish has written a book and he goes to an editing and publishing house to get it printed and published. The publisher signs a contract with Amish that allows him 10% on the total sale of the book. Amish agrees to it and according to the contract waits for the payment every quarter. He finds out after a year that the publisher had been cheating him and showing him altered sale records so as to pay him less and get more into her own pockets. Amish files a case against the publisher but couldn't prove anything since she had altered the records on her own accounts as well and had been laundering the money from the sale. She tells Amish that he cannot get her trapped no matter what he does. Amish sends a tip to the tax department and urges them to look into the matter. After five years of investigation, the tax department finds enough proofs to shut down the editing and publishing house for fraudulent ways of operation, however, the publisher could not be arrested due to lack of evidence.

Which among the following, if true, would be a strong argument against the cunning publisher?

1
If the publisher had committed a crime, she would have left some evidence behind.
2
If the publishing house is fraudulent, so are the publishers running it.
3
The editing and publishing house was run by few more people along with the mentioned publisher.
4
The owner of the editing and publishing house was not the publisher herself.
5
Amish filed a case again to see if the the proofs gathered by the tax department could help trap her.

Sponsored

hivanix.in

Visit

This quiz is brought to you by hivanix.in

🌐 Web App Development

Quick Navigation