Consider the following statements regarding the Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India case and its implications on the laws of the Indian Constitution:

A. Maneka Gandhi case is renowned for laying down the concept that the right to live under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution encompasses not just mere physical existence but a life with human dignity.

B. The case set a precedent that any law that prescribes a procedure for depriving a person of personal liberty has to be fair, just, and reasonable, not just any procedure established by law.

C. The verdict in the Maneka Gandhi case held that Article 19 and Article 21 are mutually exclusive, and a law that takes away or abridges rights under Article 19 would not be tested with the criteria laid down under Article 21.

D. The Supreme Court, in Maneka Gandhi's case, declared that the passport could be seized by the government without giving any reasons for such an action.

Choose the correct statements: