Drawing insights from Indian jurist Upendra Baxi and political economist Pratap Bhanu Mehta, evaluate the effectiveness of recent electoral reforms in India, particularly with regard to campaign finance regulations.
1
Baxi argues that electoral reforms should focus on strengthening legal mechanisms to ensure transparency and accountability in campaign financing, aligning with Mehta's call for institutional reforms to address systemic corruption and bureaucratic inefficiency.
2
According to Baxi, judicial intervention is necessary to enforce campaign finance regulations and hold political parties accountable for electoral malpractices. Mehta, however, emphasizes the need for broader institutional reforms to address the root causes of corruption and restore public trust in democratic institutions.
3
Both Baxi and Mehta advocate for comprehensive electoral reforms that address systemic weaknesses in India's electoral process, including campaign finance regulations, electoral transparency, and institutional accountability. They emphasize the importance of legal and institutional mechanisms in safeguarding democratic principles and promoting electoral integrity.
4
Baxi's focus on human rights and Mehta's critique of neoliberal governance offer valuable insights into the broader implications of electoral reforms in India, highlighting the need to prioritize democratic values and institutional resilience in the face of political challenges.