How do theories of "deliberative democracy" and "agonistic pluralism" differ in their conceptualization of the role of conflict, disagreement, and pluralism within democratic politics?
1
Deliberative democracy emphasizes the importance of rational, consensus-oriented dialogue, while agonistic pluralism sees political conflict and adversarial contestation as essential to a healthy democracy.
2
Deliberative democracy is more concerned with protecting individual rights and minority interests, while agonistic pluralism is more focused on the expression of collective identities and the struggles between them.
3
Deliberative democracy envisions the state as a neutral arbiter that facilitates public discourse, while agonistic pluralism sees the state as an arena where different social forces compete for power and hegemony.
4
All of the above