In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.

Statement: Should India limit the money spent on political rallies and campaigns?

Arguments:

I: Yes, it will save money which can be used in other welfare activities.

II: No, the amount of money spent on campaigns is directly proportional to the number of votes obtained.