Direction: In the question given below, a statement is given followed by two arguments. Read the statement and answer the question that follows.

Statement: A growing number of public figures have been campaigning to remove entirely the right to be anonymous online. Would an outright ban on anonymity be a disproportionate response?

Arguments:

I. Yes because many people have wholly legitimate and valid reasons for withholding their identity and wanting to be able to explore certain ideas online without having to face the consequences.

II. No because it is true that some users hide behind anonymity specifically in order to harass or troll others and banning anonymity will ensure the safety of users.

III. Yes because anonymous accounts inflate the user numbers they can present to advertisers, which translates into income - the overriding consideration for at least some platforms.

Which of the above arguments is/are strong arguments?