Directions: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.
Statement: Is the broiler (chicken) slaughter ban justified?
Argument:
I. Yes, broilers help the environment by reducing the risk of range fires.
II. No, meat from broilers is an inexpensive source of protein, and banning it will leave a big section deprived of it.
1
Only I is strong.
2
Only II is strong.
3
Both arguments are strong.
4
Neither argument is strong.