Directions: In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.

Statement:  Should political cartoons be regulated?

Argument:

I. Yes, under the pretext of free expression, they may prove to be divisive.

II. No, they are one of the best ways to provide insight into key social issues, events, and power relations.