In what ways does Kalhana's historiographical method in 'Rajatarangini' differ from that of Thucydides in his 'History of the Peloponnesian War'?

1. Kalhana incorporated divine intervention and mythological elements, whereas Thucydides adhered to a more secular and rational analysis of events.
2. Thucydides is known for his empirical evidence-based approach, while Kalhana often relied on oral traditions and poetic embellishments.
3. Thucydides focused on a narrower temporal and geographical scope, while Kalhana attempted a broader chronicle of Kashmir over centuries.
4. Both Kalhana and Thucydides avoided bias in their narratives, maintaining a neutral stance in recording events.