A passage is given below followed by several conclusions which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passages. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage, decide upon its truth or falsity, and choose the conclusion that best supports the passage.

The deadly riots in Israel and the war in Gaza, is likely to evoke three kinds of responses: The indifferent, the imperial, the humanitarian. Morale indifference: Instead of becoming the symbol of the unfinished tasks of decolonisation, and a human rights catastrophe, the Palestinian question is now mostly an occasion to vent cynicism. The moral questions the oppression of Palestinians poses is avoided by claiming that in this conflict we can assigning rights and wrongs equally to both sides. There is the spectacle of civilians on both sides living in terror. There is the fanaticism of the right-wing in Israel and there is the fanaticism of Hamas and Fatah. Blaming both sides also whitewashes the fact that there is a monumental injustice to the Palestinians at the heart of the problem. The imperial response: The events leading up to the recent clashes at the Al-Aqsa Mosque can be seen as part of a long pattern of pushing out Palestinians from territory Israel wants to claim. American administration has not been able to significantly roll back this project of pushing the Palestinians out. Palestine will once again be the site where the Biden administration’s liberal internationalism will face challenge. Humanitarian response: This third response is to dig beneath the politics and find bridges in shared humanity and suffering. This is also the tack of the peace movements that use culture and a history of shared suffering to build bridges. They emphasise that dispossession and exile is something both communities share; they, of all the people, should be able to understand each other. Humanity and culture, even when deeply internalised, collapse quickly when subject to fear. And they always fall short of acknowledging the core issue at stake: Political equality between two peoples.

The passage, if true, is best supported by which of the following conclusions?