Directions: The question given below consists of a passage, followed by three arguments I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' arguments and which of the arguments are 'weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.

Passage: It is agreed upon by professionals of PUBG mobile game that using claws to play the game increases the chances of winning significantly as compared to using thumbs. While using claws, you can use more than two fingers whereas thumb players can use only two. This enables claw players to engage multiple options such as Jump, fire, peek etc. simultaneously.

Which of the following arguments is strong enough to WEAKEN the statement that using claws to play yields better results than using thumb?

Arguments:

I. It has been scientifically proven that over a span of 25-30 years, using claw hurts and damages fingers more than using thumbs.

II. In a recently conducted Professional tournament involving 100 teams, Thumbs Up, the only team to use thumbs, finished first.

III. Survey shows that 20% of the claw players switched to thumb last year.